Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Date: 2012-11-08 08:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jhetley.livejournal.com
Because our tears are delicious to you?

Date: 2012-11-08 08:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
since when was contraception and abortion part of the campaign? The Republicans campaigned on the economy.

The lesson here is one side cannot count on dictating the terms on which the election will be fought. Well, a lesson. Don't let your rape-apologists talk to the press if you can avoid it would be another.

Date: 2012-11-08 08:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
Ah ha ha ha ha!

And now I am off to pill an asthmatic cat.

Date: 2012-11-08 08:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kithrup.livejournal.com
I am not clicking. neener neener neener.

Date: 2012-11-08 08:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elynne.livejournal.com
And all of my libertarian friends who think the problem is that Romney didn’t say he was okay with contraception and abortion — since when was contraception and abortion part of the campaign?

That poor baby, all those crazy liberal lies! He's so confused! It's so hard to do a Google search on "republican convention platform" and click the first non-news link and then scroll down to "Defending Marriage Against An Activist Judiciary," "A Sacred Contract: Defense of Marriage," and oh look--"The Sanctity and Dignity of Human Life." Yeah, since when is something specified as part of the official Republican campaign platform supposed to have anything to do with the official Republican campaign platform? Sheesh!

Date: 2012-11-08 08:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mme-hardy.livejournal.com
"And all of my libertarian friends who think the problem is that Romney didn’t say he was okay with contraception and abortion — since when was contraception and abortion part of the campaign? "

Note to everyone: The party platform is not part of the campaign.

Date: 2012-11-08 08:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mme-hardy.livejournal.com
Beat me to it!

Date: 2012-11-08 08:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elynne.livejournal.com
Incidentally, has someone made a userpic of that "drinking republican tears" .gif? because I'd like to use it right about now.

Date: 2012-11-08 08:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] david wilford (from livejournal.com)
We’re horrible, uncaring people. We hate everyone. We’re stupid too. We’re something out of a comedic routine.

Yep, that about sums it up.

Date: 2012-11-08 08:28 pm (UTC)
rosefox: Green books on library shelves. (Default)
From: [personal profile] rosefox
Oh wait, THAT Hoyt.

*closes tab*

Date: 2012-11-08 08:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] icedrake.livejournal.com
Damn it, that's what I came here to say!

Also, she's kind of annoying to have on a WFC panel.

Date: 2012-11-08 08:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-siobhan.livejournal.com
There is actually a commenter proposing revolt, going Galt or succession as possible solutions. Apparently in all seriousness.

I need read conservative blogs. Maybe I should, it's fascinating.

Date: 2012-11-08 08:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jhetley.livejournal.com
"Once bitten, twice shy."

Date: 2012-11-08 08:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dagibbs.livejournal.com
Why did I do that to myself? Why did I click that? Why did I read that?

Date: 2012-11-08 09:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daveon.livejournal.com
Some of them are proposing moving to Canada. :)

Date: 2012-11-08 09:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] david wilford (from livejournal.com)
Because turnabout is fair play, this is for James from "Fail Burton":

Being involved in SF has nothing to do with it per se. SF has wandered in political correctness to a degree that is staggering. Most of this is due to how much it’s been mainstreamed. 40 years ago SF literature was a still rather obscure genre inhabited by professional but aging writers with little access to their fan-base. Politics didn’t matter; good story-telling and writing did. ...

It gets worse.
Edited Date: 2012-11-08 09:20 pm (UTC)

Date: 2012-11-08 09:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vschanoes.livejournal.com
I read that, and now I'm a little stupider than I was five minutes ago. Damn it.

Date: 2012-11-08 09:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] debgeisler.livejournal.com
Including the Donald.

Date: 2012-11-08 09:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kithrup.livejournal.com
I still say all the tea partiers should go to Somalia, and prove to the world just how much liberal civilization has been holding them down.

Date: 2012-11-08 09:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kithrup.livejournal.com
As pointed out elsewhere, when your response to "our rape-apologising candidate lost" is "which one?"... you've got a serious problem.

Date: 2012-11-08 09:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arielstarshadow.livejournal.com
Boy, they are in for a surprise

Date: 2012-11-08 09:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmegaera.livejournal.com
ROFL Well, maybe they'll enjoy Stephen Harper.

Date: 2012-11-08 09:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] david wilford (from livejournal.com)
I feel a bit sorry for those crying crocodile tears over Romney losing. When Bush won re-election in 2004 at least I could listen to Randy Newman perform his "A Few Words In Defense of Our Country" at the Winnipeg Folk Festival and laugh. What does the losing side in 2012 have to listen to? Meat Loaf. Ted Nugent. I'd be crying too.

Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 4th, 2025 08:25 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios