Page Summary
al-zorra.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sesmo.livejournal.com - (no subject)
daveon.livejournal.com - (no subject)
debgeisler.livejournal.com - (no subject)
elynne.livejournal.com - (no subject)
chris-gerrib.livejournal.com - (no subject)
- (Anonymous) - (no subject)
dd-b.livejournal.com - (no subject)
vschanoes.livejournal.com - (no subject)
vschanoes.livejournal.com - (no subject)
icecreamempress.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fengi.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pickledginger.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pickledginger.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sinboy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
al-zorra.livejournal.com - (no subject)
eyelessgame.livejournal.com - (no subject)
chomiji - (no subject)
daev.livejournal.com - (no subject)
asyouknow-bob.livejournal.com - homonyms
fsandow.livejournal.com - (no subject)
caper-est.livejournal.com - Re: homonyms
caper-est.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jamiam.livejournal.com - (no subject)
blpurdom.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: Books Received, June 7 to June 13
- 2: So, there's an employee I dread managing
- 3: Bundle of Holding: Coriolis Mercy of the Icons T
- 4: People who say they like golden retrievers
- 5: Five SFF Books About Oddballs Resisting Conformity
- 6: The Transitive Properties of Cheese by Ann LeBlanc
- 7: That was fast
- 8: Five Stories About Time Travel on a Limited Scale
- 9: Five SFF Works About Contests and Competition
- 10: Five Stories About What Happens After You’ve Defeated the Big Bad
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 10:09 pm (UTC)Actually, the spewings there are terrifying, so out of reality they are. For x re abortion, have none of them actually read or heard about their own campaign platform, or listen to their own candidates?
Love, C.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 10:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 11:04 pm (UTC)(Seriously, we'll keep him - he's our problem)
no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 11:16 pm (UTC)Bruce
no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 11:34 pm (UTC)Oh, wait, she didn't mean it!
no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 11:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 11:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 11:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 11:59 pm (UTC)That Republicans lie about their agenda rather than defending it is disturbing and hopeful. Disturbing because it means they know their policies are too ugly to state openly. Hopeful because this awareness of the need to conceal ugliness may indicate some part of them objects to the ugliness as well.
The Obama supporters who ranted at third party voters indulged in dubious rationalizations, but at least they didn't flat out deny drone strikes had occurred.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-09 01:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-09 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-09 01:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-09 01:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-09 02:27 am (UTC)Contraception and abortion were the media’s theme, introduced in the Republican primary. It was never in doubt that it wouldn’t be outlawed — a president can’t do that.
President can't improve the economy either. Or write a budget. Or decide on taxes. Why does she care who the President is?
no subject
Date: 2012-11-09 02:44 am (UTC)I now have a pain in my brain. Reality is not her strong suit, is it?
And those comments are downright scary.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-09 02:46 am (UTC)homonyms
Date: 2012-11-09 04:32 am (UTC)FEEDBACK: Would not read again.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-09 05:41 am (UTC)Weird. It's like running into those so-called Christians who have never actually read anything in the Bible beyond the anti-gay quotes.
Re: homonyms
Date: 2012-11-09 06:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-09 06:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-09 06:53 am (UTC)Classic denialism. Is that a word? Do we have a word for that phenomenon? Because we need one.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-09 07:24 am (UTC)It wasn't the mainstream media that originally publicized Romney's 47% gaffe, it was a waiter with a phone who uploaded a video to YouTube. Perhaps the real reason the Republicans can't win is that they're still campaigning in 1984 and it's 2012...