Two covers
Jan. 19th, 2007 01:21 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(With the permission of Eos, who sent me jpegs when I asked who did the cover on the second one)
Both are by Julie Bell. I never saw the first cover until Eos sent me the jpegs because I read the first book in manuscript.
What caught my eye with the second cover is that the artist has not only decided to show Dag's prosthesis, she put that arm on the side towards the viewer, not on the side away from the viewer. Quite often, even when the artist has read the book [1], somewhere along the line the choice is made to downplay elements of the characters that might not appeal to the hypothetical book store browser.
The title obscures it slightly but that's not a decision the artist would have made.
1: Often the mismatch of book and cover is not the artist's fault. I seem to recall one story where an artist read some irritated comments by Jack Vance about the cover on Vance's latest book, decided to make sure that the cover the artist was working on would be the most appropriate cover possible for the book it was intended for and produced something so fine that it was reassigned from the book it was intended for to the next Jack Vance book.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 07:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 08:22 pm (UTC)To me the cover seems to resemble John Shea...
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 02:46 am (UTC)The Baen cover for "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" featured Manny's prosthetic arm prominently.
In the case of my third contemp, it was set in Indonesia, and the characters on the cover are Caucasian. There wasn't time to fix it. Luckily, within the context of the book, it is explainable.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-21 03:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-21 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 07:17 pm (UTC)It looks pretty darned good in the original!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 08:36 pm (UTC)And is it just my monitor or my eyes, or is there a slight colour variation that's not there in the original version of the painting? Whatever she's throwing on the first cover looks green, but by the time he catches it, it's yellow. When I see them together they look like they're the same colour.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 08:55 pm (UTC)I see the color variation too, btw.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 11:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 08:46 pm (UTC)speaking of covers ...
Back in the Old days of FIDOnet, before the internet became really a common thing, there was what we called an echo, mainly for writers of SF. Think of it as being like a newsgroup.
One of the authors complained that their publisher had chosen cover art that had absolutely nothing to do with the story - the cover showed a large blue turtloid creature putting humans into a cage on its back. This spawned an acronym - FBT (Friggin' Blue Turtloids)- which became somewhat of a byword/injoke on the echo. IIRC, the author was John DeChancie.
When my co-author and I had our first book published, we went to a meeting with the publisher, which we were told was to discuss the potential cover designs. Instead when we walked in, we were handed the completed book. Fortunately the cover was one we could live with, but it did serve to bring back the memory of the FBT, and still serves as a reminder that very often the author of a book has little or no input on the cover design.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 11:00 pm (UTC)And yes, the FBT author was definitely John DeChancie. I recently (regretfully) got rid of my DUOE (dried up old eunuchs) badge.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 11:14 pm (UTC)cool, I had no idea that the SF echo was alive still.
I regretfully closed my BBS in 1998, just before it would have turned 10 years old. At that time I was down to a handful of stalwart callers. Most of my best users had long since become points, and I maintained a dialup for them for a short time after the board itself closed.
We certainly had some good times, back in the Good Old Days :-)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 07:20 pm (UTC)