james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
By pointing out this justification for space colonization. I think I might call it the "boiling frog" argument.

I will admit that I've see this idea before (and used it myself) but I question the timescale the author uses, which seems to rely on this

For the last 100 years, global energy consumption has been growing three percent per year, which is a little more than twice as fast as population growth and about 0.7 percent slower than global GDP growth.

It was my impression that per capita energy use rates in developed nations isn't growing all that fast.

The author also overlooks the possiblity that even though being able to escape a rapidly heating planet -- and I mean the kind of heat that leaves a planet sterile, not just shifts climate zones towards the poles -- would be handy, we might fail to develop the ability to do it in the time frame specified. I guess that bit would be the Green Lantern model of space development: all you need is the will.

[added later]

There's also the possibility that while we might decide to move our more heat-productive activities off-planet, that might not include moving us. Earth is after all the easiest planet for us to live on.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 08:54 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios