Hypothesis about New Mexico
Aug. 24th, 2012 08:56 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It is not just that there's a 'mexico' in the name, it's that there are too many states to keep track of the names. How many nations have the equivalent of fifty plus provinces and territories?
Accordingly, how would you lump the states together to get a dozen or so states of roughly equal population?
Accordingly, how would you lump the states together to get a dozen or so states of roughly equal population?
no subject
Date: 2012-08-25 12:19 pm (UTC)But don't Scotland and Northern Ireland have some legal differences to England and Wales, eg house buying, abortion, equality rules?
I'm guessing England's 82 are counties, or their successor? US states have counties too, though I've no ideal if they're legally and administrively equivalent.
And does England really have 82 things that are equivalent to NI, Scotland, Wales? Do they not have their own counties or divisions? I know NI has 6 traditional counties.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-25 12:51 pm (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserved_matters
It sounds to me as if Scotland now has legal status somewhat greater than a US state, the others maybe somewhat less, though it's not an exact comparison.
In the US, the status of counties varies from state to state. In some states like Virginia, incorporated cities and counties are geographically exclusive, so counties generally provide the local government in areas that are not inside of cities. In others, like Massachusetts, cities and towns geographically cover every point in the state, and counties are an overlay of larger regions whose government is nearly vestigial (controlling the court and prison systems and not much else).
no subject
Date: 2012-08-25 03:19 pm (UTC)New England is a bit unusual, though.