For much the same reasons that led me to say "Perhaps in the spirit of egalitarianism one could eschew naming the goal of getting more women on panels after a man," please don't refer to my on-going f/m documentation as "the Nicoll test".
Eh, can it be a test if the outcome is only implied and not specifically stated? The Bechdall test was a test right from its invention, whereas all you've been doing is compiling stats (I say 'all', clearly it was a lot of work) and letting them tell their own story.
There was an article compiled at Strange Horizons with massive data on slush piles... I'm not turning it up in a quick google search though I'm sure I could if I gave it slightly more attention (and may later). But perhaps her last name would be a good selection.
Not that your stats aren't cool and great, but it does seem like there have been women pointing out the disparities for a long time, too, and it's interesting what catches on.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 08:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 04:04 pm (UTC)Joanna Russ Test
Date: 2012-03-15 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 06:21 pm (UTC)Not that your stats aren't cool and great, but it does seem like there have been women pointing out the disparities for a long time, too, and it's interesting what catches on.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-15 08:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-16 12:25 am (UTC)- Krin
* provided you did have a mother**
** and she did share the last name of your father***
*** and you share his last name****
**** otherwise. Opps, sorry
no subject
Date: 2012-03-16 04:50 am (UTC)