Date: 2011-12-22 06:34 pm (UTC)
I would have to go digging through boxes and boxes of old comics to verify, but I believe the offensive nature of the name was brought up by a reader of colour in an earlier issue's comments page and this then prompted a back and forth discussion with Gruenwald over the next few issues.

Gruenwald was quite shocked and ashamed that he had inadvertently used an offensive term and did his best within the story and letters column to both correct the mistake and also bring it to the attention of people who were also ignorant of the name's history.

I really did get the impression at the time that Gruenwald really did want to put things right. Setting aside the fact that he couldn't go back in time and redo things, I think the way he tried to correct his mistake was both clever and classy.

Of course, I was also about eight years old, so my memory might be betraying me here.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 28th, 2025 06:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios