Date: 2011-08-16 06:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keithmm.livejournal.com
(monotone)I am shocked to learn that someone who doesn't know what he's talking about was proven to be wrong.(/monotone)
Edited Date: 2011-08-16 06:38 pm (UTC)

Date: 2011-08-16 07:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kithrup.livejournal.com
And on the internet, no less!

Date: 2011-08-16 08:41 pm (UTC)
seawasp: (Default)
From: [personal profile] seawasp
Isn't that supposed to be "Shocked, SHOCKED"?

Date: 2011-08-16 10:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keithmm.livejournal.com
Nah, that would require emphasis that a monotone response simply doesn't allow.

Date: 2011-08-17 12:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lederhosen.livejournal.com
I initially missed the 'Neal' in your title, and thought you were talking about Scott Adams, who also had an expanding Earth model*.

*although, being Scott Adams, he inevitably hid behind the "I'm just throwing this out there to make you think, if it turns out to be self-evident garbage then I never believed it" that he loves so much.

Date: 2011-08-17 04:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] austin-dern.livejournal.com

Hadn't realized Scott Adams pushed an expanding Earth model. Wasn't surprised, but hadn't realized either.

Date: 2011-08-17 05:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lederhosen.livejournal.com
In one of his books, he suggested that maybe gravity doesn't exist and everything in the universe is expanding, so it just appears like things are pulled towards one another.

(Debunking this explanation is left as an exercise for the reader.)

Date: 2011-08-17 07:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] runningbadger.blogspot.com (from livejournal.com)
Was that the same book where he said in the foreword he'd put in a mix of made-up nonsense and Things Physicists Really Believe, and anyone who really knew their stuff would know which was which? (Unless, of course, it turned out that he misunderstood Real Science badly enough to garble the stuff which was meant to be accurate)

Date: 2011-08-17 08:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lederhosen.livejournal.com
It was The Dilbert Future. I don't recall the foreword, but that bit was in the chapter where he predicted that "the theory of evolution would be disproved in our lifetime".

Date: 2011-08-19 01:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] runningbadger.blogspot.com (from livejournal.com)
I was thinking of God's Debris.

I gave The Dilbert Future to my father as a Christmas present. I think I might have stolen it back to protect his sanity when I discovered what a pile of garbage the last chapter was.

Date: 2011-08-19 04:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lederhosen.livejournal.com
Hm, sounds like he'd started weaseling pre-emptively for GD?

Date: 2011-08-17 03:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blindgeoff.livejournal.com
I followed the 2nd link... I think I've had my brain permanently damaged by Teh Stooop!d.

Thanks!

Date: 2011-08-17 05:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scott-sanford.livejournal.com
Yeah? I fiddled with the idea that Earth was expanding too - when I was about ten. After thinking about accelerating expansion as a plausible substitute for gravity, I decided the whole thing didn't really work out and this "gravity" force fit better. But, hey, I was a kid; what's Adams' excuse?

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 6th, 2025 04:23 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios