james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
What do people think of the 2009 BBC version of Day of the Triffids?

Date: 2011-02-19 07:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barberio.livejournal.com
It's a "re-imagining" of the original rather than an adaptation, and not in a particularly good way. Eddie Izzard gets to be in it's first really really really stupid set piece.

Date: 2011-02-19 07:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daveon.livejournal.com
Er... it wasn't all that good really.

Date: 2011-02-19 07:52 pm (UTC)
ext_6388: Avon from Blake's 7 fails to show an emotion (Default)
From: [identity profile] fridgepunk.livejournal.com
Let me just explain the backstory for the setting: global warming has been solved by having genetically engineered triffids produce oil.

So keep sharp objects away from you while watching.

Date: 2011-02-19 08:33 pm (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
I weatched the first episode on broadcast. Despite having iPlayer on my TV, and being something of a fan of both the book and previous adaptations when I was a kid, I strangely managed to miss the later episodes.

Very high production standards and budget, with an excellent cast. All wasted from what I saw. It's possible it got better, but reviews and blogs said otherwise.

Date: 2011-02-19 08:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] terheyt.livejournal.com
It's awful. Utterly atrocious. Hour-long-rant-worthy.

Great production values, but the changed the story to involve magical mystical jungle shamans, emo eye make-up induced by self-poisoning, and triffid tentacles so strong that handlers need to carry tazers.

Right. Not getting started again. But do yourself a favour and re-read the book.

Date: 2011-02-19 10:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/krin_o_o_/
So basically it's a valiant but doomed and wasted effort on the part of all parties except the writers and producers who insisted on a badly scripted Eco-rant against big corps using fraken-plants as the strawmen to move the rather spare plot along?

Date: 2011-02-20 02:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] puritybrown.livejournal.com
Others have touched on the problems introduced into the story in the course of adaptation, so I will just add: I could have lived with the travesty they'd made of Wyndham's story if it hadn't been so incredibly dull. Despite having quite a lot of action and high dramatic scenes, the show was let down by a script that was so on-the-nose that it might as well have been banging every audience member on the head with a sledgehammer. No subtlety, no layers, and no possibility of letting the audience think for a microsecond. There was nothing to think about: everything was laid out with the most excruciating obviousness.

Date: 2011-02-20 09:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michaelgr.livejournal.com
You'd be less bored watching actual plants grow than watching these modern triffids. It's dull and silly and not even unintentionally funny.

Date: 2011-02-20 01:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pauldormer.livejournal.com
Saw the first half. Didn't bother with the second.

Date: 2011-02-20 05:53 pm (UTC)

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 910
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 2324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 04:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios