Active Entries
- 1: That was fast
- 2: Five SFF Works About Contests and Competition
- 3: Stupid but true
- 4: Bundle of Holding: Pride Games
- 5: Clarke Award Finalists 1999
- 6: The Long Loud Silence By Wilson Tucker
- 7: Books Received, May 24 to May 30
- 8: Mars or bust
- 9: Inventing the Renaissance by Ada Palmer
- 10: (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Re: Why so serious?
Date: 2010-07-06 05:45 am (UTC)Yet we tolerate manually-driven groundcars AND manually-operated aircraft, both. Perhaps you also consider both of these terrible ideas. If not, how would manually-driven flying cars be any different?
As for practical, a few previous designs have proved to be quite practical, as I expect the Terrafugia Transition will be. They fly, they drive, the owners can operate them safely.
I believe that two of the four or five Taylor Aerocars are still in operable condition; I have seen one of them fly with my own eyes.
They might never make economic sense, because of design compromises and costs, but I don't see "physically practical" to be a barrier.