Re: Why so serious?

Date: 2010-07-06 05:45 am (UTC)
ext_63737: Posing at Zeusaphone concert, 2008 (Rocket Belt rocketbelt jetpack)
Manually-driven flying cars are a terrible idea even if they were physically practical, which they're not.

Yet we tolerate manually-driven groundcars AND manually-operated aircraft, both. Perhaps you also consider both of these terrible ideas. If not, how would manually-driven flying cars be any different?

As for practical, a few previous designs have proved to be quite practical, as I expect the Terrafugia Transition will be. They fly, they drive, the owners can operate them safely.

I believe that two of the four or five Taylor Aerocars are still in operable condition; I have seen one of them fly with my own eyes.

They might never make economic sense, because of design compromises and costs, but I don't see "physically practical" to be a barrier.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 3rd, 2025 02:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios