Feb. 4th, 2008

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
WLU's Student Union turns down secular club on the grounds that it is too secular:

While the Campus Clubs department understands the goals and visions of your organization, they are not compatible with the guidelines of what may be approved and incorporated into our department. While the promotion of reason, science and freedom of inquiry are perfectly legitimate goals, what is most in question in regards to your club's vision is the promotion of "a fulfilling life without religion and superstition". While this university is indeed technically a secular institution, secular does not denote taking an active stance in opposition to the principles and status of religious beliefs and practices. To be clear, this is not meant to say that the promotion of science and reason are illegitimate goals. But due to the need to respect and tolerate the views of others, the Campus Clubs department is unable to approve a club of this nature at this time. If you wish to adjust and rethink your club's application and vision, you may resubmit a revised proposal at any time.


Pharyngula's coverage of the story. Note that contrary to this article, WLU's administration had nothing to do with this decision. Also, down in the comments there's an American who seems a little unclear on the idea of Canada as an independent nation, which probably means it's time to burn the White House again.
james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
WLU's Student Union turns down secular club on the grounds that it is too secular:

While the Campus Clubs department understands the goals and visions of your organization, they are not compatible with the guidelines of what may be approved and incorporated into our department. While the promotion of reason, science and freedom of inquiry are perfectly legitimate goals, what is most in question in regards to your club's vision is the promotion of "a fulfilling life without religion and superstition". While this university is indeed technically a secular institution, secular does not denote taking an active stance in opposition to the principles and status of religious beliefs and practices. To be clear, this is not meant to say that the promotion of science and reason are illegitimate goals. But due to the need to respect and tolerate the views of others, the Campus Clubs department is unable to approve a club of this nature at this time. If you wish to adjust and rethink your club's application and vision, you may resubmit a revised proposal at any time.


Pharyngula's coverage of the story. Note that contrary to this article, WLU's administration had nothing to do with this decision. Also, down in the comments there's an American who seems a little unclear on the idea of Canada as an independent nation, which probably means it's time to burn the White House again.
james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
WLU's Student Union turns down secular club on the grounds that it is too secular:

While the Campus Clubs department understands the goals and visions of your organization, they are not compatible with the guidelines of what may be approved and incorporated into our department. While the promotion of reason, science and freedom of inquiry are perfectly legitimate goals, what is most in question in regards to your club's vision is the promotion of "a fulfilling life without religion and superstition". While this university is indeed technically a secular institution, secular does not denote taking an active stance in opposition to the principles and status of religious beliefs and practices. To be clear, this is not meant to say that the promotion of science and reason are illegitimate goals. But due to the need to respect and tolerate the views of others, the Campus Clubs department is unable to approve a club of this nature at this time. If you wish to adjust and rethink your club's application and vision, you may resubmit a revised proposal at any time.


Pharyngula's coverage of the story. Note that contrary to this article, WLU's administration had nothing to do with this decision. Also, down in the comments there's an American who seems a little unclear on the idea of Canada as an independent nation, which probably means it's time to burn the White House again.

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 06:04 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios