Date: 2014-10-30 04:57 am (UTC)
A lovely review. It would be worth looking at the differences between the Reader's Digest Condensed Version and the unabridged edition. As I vaguely recall, the Reader's Digest emphasized the grimmer parts. Not sure if they were trying to conform to an American post-holocaust norm by that point, because I read a rather cheery Philip Wylie post-holocaust RD version (50s era) which I tore apart in Some Scholastic Essay On Post Holocaust Literature either late in my high school or early in my college years. I do remember comparing the Wylie to Alas Babylon and Malevil, which meant I read the nonabridged edition at that point.

I am not conversant in ROT-13, so I'll refrain from a spoilerish comment about Emmanuel, except to say that it was sadly ironic and not in line with the American post-holocaust story.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 27th, 2025 05:43 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios