Date: 2013-08-29 07:59 pm (UTC)
Spallation costs maybe 60 MeV of energy per neutron produced. And the best spallation sources are of fissionable materials, where most of the neutrons end up coming from secondary (subcritical) fission.

Spallation reactors might make sense for destroying higher transuranics (curium, etc.), which tend to have so few delayed neutrons when fissioned that you cannot operate a conventional reactor using them (far too much risk of going prompt supercritical -- BOOM). But if you're extracting and concentrating the transuranics for destruction, it's probably easier to just package them up and shoot them into space instead.

Fusors are fun toys, but cannot work as an energy source. Even as neutron sources, they really suck.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 02:59 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios