Date: 2012-08-23 09:37 pm (UTC)
It's easy to point fingers at lots of open source software and the process under which it's written and deployed and disseminated, but honestly, I don't see much of a measurable difference in the quality, across the field as a whole, between open source, and closed source, software.

If the open source movement is guilty of anything it's making clear that the cost of robust, free, open software is that the creation space must also permit cohabitation with flaky, fragile, horribly maintained, free, open software whereas closed source, for-profit businesses can afford to sweep those kinds of things (mostly) into the dark closets of their own hallways before the public ever sees them.

Frankly, all things being equal, if I had to have the fruits of only one model or the other, I'd chose what the open source world has produced. Luckily, we don't, yet, have to make that choice.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 8th, 2025 04:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios