Active Entries
- 1: Five SFF Books About Oddballs Resisting Conformity
- 2: The Transitive Properties of Cheese by Ann LeBlanc
- 3: People who say they like golden retrievers
- 4: So, there's an employee I dread managing
- 5: Bundle of Holding: Coriolis Mercy of the Icons T
- 6: That was fast
- 7: Five Stories About Time Travel on a Limited Scale
- 8: Five SFF Works About Contests and Competition
- 9: Five Stories About What Happens After You’ve Defeated the Big Bad
- 10: Clarke Award Finalists 2000
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2008-10-25 03:48 pm (UTC)Nobody cares about the average quality of a randomly selected set of Wikipedia articles; it's the ones people actually find when looking for information that they care about, and those are not randomly selected.
As has already been pointed out, a mediocre article on a trivial subject just sitting there is *harmless*. Having that mediocre article on the trivial subject is *better* than having *nothing* on that trivial subject, if anybody ever looks for it.