Praise to the anthropocene?

[identity profile] ed-rex.livejournal.com 2016-03-01 05:03 am (UTC)(link)
I'm no climate scientist either, but I remember reading something "recently" (I'm 51; recently has become a pretty elastic term, but I think it was written within the past 20 years) looked at the predictions of a renewed ice-age and wondered whether the agricultural revolution — with all its forest-chopping and farming — has forestalled it.

Re: Praise to the anthropocene?

[identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com 2016-03-01 04:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Greenhouse-gas emissions have probably put off the next ice age for many thousands of years. There's a minority position among climate-contrarian types that global warming is real, but it's good, because we would have otherwise been hit by the ICE DOOM by now (the position in Fallen Angels, if I recall correctly).

As far as I can tell the timing of the ice age is nonsense, it wouldn't have happened for thousands of years, but the basic principle of anthropogenic global warming killing it is sound.

I think the popularity of this position in the science-fiction community comes from a 1986 Analog article by George W. Harper called "A Little More Pollution, Please!" I recall T. A. Heppenheimer citing it as a good argument that AGW was a good thing.

Re: Praise to the anthropocene?

[identity profile] ed-rex.livejournal.com 2016-03-14 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I think the popularity of this position in the science-fiction community comes from a 1986 Analog article by George W. Harper called "A Little More Pollution, Please!"

Belatedly replying to say, Yes, I'm pretty sure that's where I heard it. The timing and source certainly fit.