Ten percent of the SFWA did vote for him in all his misogynist white supremacist glory, which does strike me as "alarmingly close to the mainstream". Given that there's a basic filter of "capable of writing and selling at least a couple works" which presumably clears out the real droolers.
Someone else raises that question. The author replies:
I don't mean "alarmingly close to the mainstream" as a compliment. I mean that nutty and frothing freakery is more common and closer to accepted on issues of gender than on, say, issues of race. "Society conspires to advance the interests of women over men, and women can't be trusted" is tolerated to a greater extent than the same comment with "blacks" substituted would be, for no logical reason.
Yes, and the thread James links to has at least a dozen of those racial slurs. Personally, I find Popehat to be routinely clueless on things such as intersectionalism (and politeness, and modesty, etc. etc.)
Oh, look. Comments filled with guys explaining how geekdom is a men-only space where the socially awkward found sweet refuge, and all those evil fake geek girls are coming in and making them uncomfortable and shit! Because guuuuuuuuurls didn't go to conventions decades ago! Or play RPGs! Or read SF! I was a figment of my own imagination!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
And the excuse someone had for voting for him so the Cabal wouldn't get a hold of the treasury! was amusing.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject