I clicked, and I am going to go and read something entirely different now. whoa.
Also, like Shetterly, I cannot duplicate the browser-cookie result that a commenter alleges as linking Cherie Priest with specfriction. Commenter must've gotten something crossed in browser history after visiting her site. (Like, someone's attempt to link Priest to that Tumblr is the only other reason to skim the linked page, and here I am to say that that part is empty.)
__utmz cookies are used by Google Analytics to track how people get to a site. The one posted on that thread simply means that at some point in the last six months, that commenter followed a link from cheriepriest.com to authorlife.tumblr.com. It has nothing to do with the specfriction Tumblr and nothing to do with the ownership of any Tumblr.
If so, it's because of people's own reading page styles; they show up just
fine for me on my LJ friends page and on your own journal page when I
unclick "view in own style".
OH GOD THE WILL SHITTERLY TAG MAKES ME WANT TO GO BACK TO SEE JUST HOW STUPID HE IS TODAY AND I ALREADY SAW HIM MAKING A STUPID FUCKING ASS OF HIMSELF ON MARY ROBINETTE KOWAL'S POST.
You are a bad person. I am certain of it. For the record.
Okay, I don't generally read comments on random blogs%, so I can't tell if I should be deeply grateful, or if I'm missing something unintentionally hilarious.
Yes. Scalzi is a "gamma" and a "rabbit" and a "pinkshirt" because he is stupid and believes "women" might be "people" and not "vending machines with vaginas". This gives him and everyone like him a totally unmanly pink shirt.
The funny part is, of course, pink = female is, as I recall, at the earliest a mid-19th century concept and didn't receive widespread acceptance in North America (at least) until well into the 20th century. So, for someone like Beale who claims he's so into tradition...
It's very much a 20th Century thing, at least when it comes to associations with the gender of children.
From http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/When-Did-Girls-Start-Wearing-Pink.html :
For example, a June 1918 article from the trade publication Earnshaw's Infants' Department said, “The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls. The reason is that pink, being a more decided and stronger color, is more suitable for the boy, while blue, which is more delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl.” Other sources said blue was flattering for blonds, pink for brunettes; or blue was for blue-eyed babies, pink for brown-eyed babies
In 1927, Time magazine printed a chart showing sex-appropriate colors for girls and boys according to leading U.S. stores. In Boston, Filene’s told parents to dress boys in pink. So did Best & Co. in New York City, Halle’s in Cleveland and Marshall Field in Chicago.
The article suggests that the now-standard associations really didn't become set until the 1940s. (There are some great photos accompanying the article, such as that of a long-haired, 2 1/2-year-old FDR in a white dress, the standard costume for young children of both sexes in the late 19th Century.)
I associate them with the 80s, along with other pastel colors. I have photographic evidence of a friend of mine, who also likes to shoot rifles and blow things up, wearing one, avec mullet, circa 1985.
Is there any evidence that Beale has even met a woman? His Wikipedia entry claims three children, but there's no cite. Maybe they're like Lou Antonelli's furbabies.
To be fair, and even though I sorta liked the guy personally, he did have to go all the way to Russia to find a girl, and did it through one of those Bride Auction thingies. (Not that he paid money, but, ya know...)
Frankowski *paid a poor Russian woman to marry him*, with her fully understanding that the wealthy American was two generations her senior and would die and leave her his money eventually. And, after meeting him, she dumped him anyway.
I thought I was the only one who still remembered Pinko as a communist insult. Of course I may have gotten it from the Chad Mitchell Trio song the John Birch Society. "We're after Rosie Clooney, we've gotten Pinky Lee, and the day we get Red Skelton won't that be a victory!" And it was my mom's family's tape, I was just indoctrinated early.
The funniest thing about the whole Beale/SFWA thing to me is that Beale transparently wants SFWA to kick him out, because it would feed his heroic-victim delusions. So he did something that in any other trade organization would be immediately, obviously worthy of expulsion. But my heavens, judging someone on the basis of their actions might be hasty, hroom hroom.
Beale's clearly having a grand old time with all this. The convenient thing about having a persecution complex is that every situation's win-win: if you win, you've just won; if you lose, you get to complain about it.
Ten percent of the SFWA did vote for him in all his misogynist white supremacist glory, which does strike me as "alarmingly close to the mainstream". Given that there's a basic filter of "capable of writing and selling at least a couple works" which presumably clears out the real droolers.
Someone else raises that question. The author replies:
I don't mean "alarmingly close to the mainstream" as a compliment. I mean that nutty and frothing freakery is more common and closer to accepted on issues of gender than on, say, issues of race. "Society conspires to advance the interests of women over men, and women can't be trusted" is tolerated to a greater extent than the same comment with "blacks" substituted would be, for no logical reason.
Yes, and the thread James links to has at least a dozen of those racial slurs. Personally, I find Popehat to be routinely clueless on things such as intersectionalism (and politeness, and modesty, etc. etc.)
Oh, look. Comments filled with guys explaining how geekdom is a men-only space where the socially awkward found sweet refuge, and all those evil fake geek girls are coming in and making them uncomfortable and shit! Because guuuuuuuuurls didn't go to conventions decades ago! Or play RPGs! Or read SF! I was a figment of my own imagination!
no subject
no subject
no subject
Also, like Shetterly, I cannot duplicate the browser-cookie result that a commenter alleges as linking Cherie Priest with specfriction. Commenter must've gotten something crossed in browser history after visiting her site. (Like, someone's attempt to link Priest to that Tumblr is the only other reason to skim the linked page, and here I am to say that that part is empty.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
If so, it's because of people's own reading page styles; they show up just fine for me on my LJ friends page and on your own journal page when I unclick "view in own style".
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
You are a bad person. I am certain of it. For the record.
no subject
----
% James is not chaotic, not random.
no subject
And sometimes he doesn't see things. But when he links them, Linking Is Clearly Not Endorsement, unless you miss the dry.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
There is room for detente!
no subject
What is a "pinkshirt"? Is that a dig at Scalzi?
no subject
no subject
no subject
http://voxday.blogspot.ca/2013/07/a-scandal-day-for-sfwa.html#c6242768167212190144
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
From http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/When-Did-Girls-Start-Wearing-Pink.html :
The article suggests that the now-standard associations really didn't become set until the 1940s. (There are some great photos accompanying the article, such as that of a long-haired, 2 1/2-year-old FDR in a white dress, the standard costume for young children of both sexes in the late 19th Century.)
no subject
no subject
We called the color "salmon" so it was manly.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
--Dave, free to be whichever me is real
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(BTW, fans of Leo: obit locked due to a spam problem. Probably be unlocked in a year or so)
no subject
The unmotivated jumps in tone and logic in his prose style make me wonder. They're a little like Dave Sim's.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Frankowski is perhaps not a relevant comparison.
no subject
Literally, pinko-nazi.
no subject
("Why not both!")
no subject
no subject
Is there supposed to be a joke in the misspelling?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Beale's clearly having a grand old time with all this. The convenient thing about having a persecution complex is that every situation's win-win: if you win, you've just won; if you lose, you get to complain about it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
And the excuse someone had for voting for him so the Cabal wouldn't get a hold of the treasury! was amusing.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject