james_davis_nicoll (
james_davis_nicoll) wrote2013-06-21 10:58 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A Superman truly fit for modern movies
As mass murdery as the new Superman is, I don't think he is dark enough. I think it would have been edgier if it turned out Kryptonian visitors inspired Aztec myths thanks to their need to eat the hearts of photogenic children to power their abilities; Kal could feel very badly about having to zoom back to the Metropololis Orphanarium to get another power-up; it wouldn't just be pointless gore but characterization.
I don't see things working out well for young Jimmy Olsen in this version.
I don't see things working out well for young Jimmy Olsen in this version.
no subject
The 'S' stands for 'Sucking your blood to give you hope'.
no subject
No, I don't think they're directly related.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Third major fight in less than 24 hours, and this after living with the "hold yourself back" lesson his whole life. I'm surprised that it wasn't worse.
no subject
And the Daily Planet's just open right back up for business at the end of the movie, and everybody's quite cheery. The very last exchange is clever and cute, but being clever and cute on the mass graves of the recently dead is weird.
ETA: When I say it doesn't register as a problem, I mean it doesn't register with the filmmakers. Superman's only as dumb as they are.
no subject
As for that closing scene at the Planet, I wonder. Might be "soldiering on" humour at work from the POV of the characters.
no subject
Anyway my problem isn't that he couldn't take the fight away, it's that he doesn't show any particular awareness or concern about the devastation. Not even a half-second shot of him going, "No, not Main Street!" or "My God, Mr. Billings!" Or later, in the makeout scene I mentioned, he and Lois could instead look around and think, "Jesus, look at all this." He never shows much impact unless it's Lois or his mom being threatened. And again, this isn't a criticism of Superman's inner character, but of the filmmakers' thought processes and how they think character motivation works. It's of a piece with the Snyder interview I linked to in the previous thread, in which he explains that he didn't think Superman's aversion to murder would be adequately explained unless he tried it first.
no subject
Wanna bet those scenes got dropped at some point between script and final edit lockdown?
no subject
no subject
Snyder might, as a person, be concerned with the characters—I don't know him. Any concern doesn't really come through in the films, and is less evident with each film: I have no idea about 300, one could argue it was scripted into pieces like Watchmen and Dawn (it is rather the heart of horror), and I don't remember a thing about Sucker Punch except an abiding rage that attractive visuals had been wasted in service of nothing.
I had hopes for Snyder, but he has not fulfilled them.
no subject
no subject
Though would you believe, there is actually a fantasy series that goes something like that? The hero can turn into a dragon and be pretty much unstoppable - but once the God Mode wears off, he's left almost too weak to move and has to trick some soft-hearted soul to come close to him by playing on their compassion for his pitiful state, and then tear open their throat and drink their blood. It wasn't the best series in the world, but it certainly didn't wuss out on the whole "magic is dark and scary and comes at a cost" thing.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject