I doubt there's much in the way of denying that dust storms happened, but I'm sure there are people that don't believe that human activity contributed to it in any way.
What's more plausible—that free-market agricultural policies created an ecological and economic catastrophe, or that the Earth passed through the dust-filled tail of a gigantic comet?
Denial that farming practices helped cause it, maybe.
Now, Stuart, if you look at the soil around any large US city, there's a big undeground homosexual population. Des Moines, Iowa, for an example. Look at the soil around Des Moines, Stuart. You can't build on it; you can't grow anything in it. The government says it's due to poor farming. But I know what's really going on, Stuart. I know it's the queers. They're in it with the aliens. They're building landing strips for gay Martians, I swear to God.
There's a well-known libertarian economist whose name I will not specify because my memory is so vague about the conversation we had, bu he certainly denied something about the dustbowl. Was it the human origin of it? But he's a compulsive contrarian and probably cannot be held to anything he says.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
No it ain't.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yes: I practice Dust Bowl denialism denialism.
no subject
no subject
--Hawk
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
--Dave, or is it that they all sound alike to me?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
To the extent that humanity cannot control its own numbers and activities, we are still in the realm of animals.