james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll ([personal profile] james_davis_nicoll) wrote2013-04-25 12:03 am

Bold!

Bet it doesn't fly, though.




"All of those conclusions was taken out based on Criminal Code and all of us we know that this Criminal Code is not a holy book," Esseghaier said. "It's just written by a set of creations and the creations they're not perfect because only the Creator is perfect.

"We cannot rely on the conclusions taken out from these judgments."


Prediction: fbzrbar vf tbvat gb cbc va naq pynvz pnanqn be bagnevb hfrf funevnu ynj onfrq ba n pbzcyrgr zvfhaqrefgnaqvat bs guvf rirag.

[identity profile] keithmm.livejournal.com 2013-04-26 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
There are actually several verses, dipshit, not just one.

And your point? The Bible is full of verses that talk about how lying is sinful, Revelations 21:8 for instance ("But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone."). Oddly enough, this doesn't mean that a Christian can be assumed to be truthful, even though their holy book requires them to be.

(Pimps, oddly enough, have never been in short supply amongst Christians either. Or murderers.)

So why, other than bigotry, should one assume the opposite for a Muslim? Oh, that's right, because they're just a Faceless Brown Horde, aren't they? They're not real people with real human virtues and vices, just like anyone else.

[identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com 2013-04-26 05:24 am (UTC)(link)
The words you keep trying to put in my mouth give a valuable insight into the way you think; but then, everyone who reads them can tell that.

They have nothing to do with what I think, naturally.

[identity profile] carloshasanax.livejournal.com 2013-04-26 12:17 pm (UTC)(link)
We all know you're an ignorant bigot, Matthew.

[identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com 2013-04-26 05:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not the one favoring the ban on DDT that kills four million nonwhite people a year.

[identity profile] carloshasanax.livejournal.com 2013-04-26 07:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Dude, you're an idiot. There aren't four million malaria deaths a year, and most of those are in areas where the mosquito has developed significant DDT resistance. Why do you want to use an obsolete pesticide? Do you hate brown people that much?

So. Try again, asswipe.

[identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com 2013-04-26 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)
You have just made statements which I know you are aware are false.

[identity profile] carloshasanax.livejournal.com 2013-04-26 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
The number of deaths from malaria are under a million a year. The World Health Organization estimates 660 thousand in 2010. They're mainly in areas of Africa which have mosquitoes that have developed resistance to DDT. This is well known.

As for your bigotry, dude. You're deeply proud of collaborating with a man who wants to scare Mexicans away from emergency rooms. Frankly, I'm surprised you haven't promoted sex with five-year-old girls or denied the Holocaust yet.

[identity profile] rwpikul.livejournal.com 2013-04-26 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Not to mention the little fact that the DDT ban exempts situations where there is a significant threat to human health.

(IOW: If you really need to use it, you can.)