james_davis_nicoll (
james_davis_nicoll) wrote2013-04-01 01:19 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
2012 got me no Hugo nomination in 2013
But you know what it did get me? From Rapture of the Nerds:
It’s called a Nicoll-Dyson beam—a laser weapon powered by a star—and just one of them is capable of evaporating an Earth-sized planet a thousand light-years away in half an hour flat.So there's that. (it takes a week to evaporate an Earth-sized world with the combined power of a Sun-like star, boo hiss, but to make up for it the range is more like one million light-years)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
James doesn't have to describe that. He only has to describe the laser, and some applications for it.
The fact that, due to matters of scale, it's not possible right now, or for the foreseeable future, is not likely to matter to the USPTO, which typically has a grant-first-ask-questions-only-during-lawsuits policy.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Patent
Hmm apparently at the end of his life, he was quoted as saying 'I'm often asked why I didn't try to patent the idea of communications satellites. My answer is always, "A patent is really a license to be sued" ' which I suppose is true but maybe slightly sour grapes.
no subject
no subject
See also:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.0825
When I saw this paper, the Nicoll-Dyson beam came to mind, even though the scale, though vast, is much smaller.
Interstellar radar is a potential intermediate step between passive observation of exoplanets and interstellar exploratory missions. Compared to passive observation, it has the traditional advantages of radar astronomy. It can measure surface characteristics, determine spin rates and axes, provide extremely accurate ranges, construct maps of planets, distinguish liquid from solid surfaces, find rings and moons, and penetrate clouds. It can do this even for planets close to the parent star. Compared to interstellar travel or probes, it also offers significant advantages. The technology required to build such a radar already exists, radar can return results within a human lifetime, and a single facility can investigate thousands of planetary systems. The cost, although high, is within the reach of Earth's economy, so it is cheaper as well.
no subject
no subject
no subject
The plot (MAJOR SPOILERS)
was that the universe is a simulation that only simulated in detail the parts that needed it (around Earth). The lidar pulse reached Alpha Centauri and was not reflected by the planet that was known to be there, because the simulation didn't keep up. This eventually crashed the simulation (and the universe) entirely.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-02 01:19 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
But the arXiv paper describes an interstellar radar whose Earth intensity is 10% of insolation over its ground source, 10,000 km2? "Not immediately destructive to airplanes or birds." The paper fails to mention dispersion that I see but certainly there will be some. So probably a minor annoyance at most.
Also, cost $20 trillion. I'm impressed to find a case where imaging looks more expensive than sending an interstellar probe, or even several probes. Still faster, though.
no subject
no subject