james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll ([personal profile] james_davis_nicoll) wrote2013-03-13 03:00 pm

That ... was fast

I thought there was no consensus heading into the conclave?

New pope chosen

[identity profile] mindstalk.livejournal.com 2013-03-14 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
He's also been linked to the "dirty war", liking hiding political prisoners from human rights delegations.

http://rfmcdpei.livejournal.com/3398074.html
Edited 2013-03-14 03:15 (UTC)

[identity profile] daveon.livejournal.com 2013-03-14 05:46 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, excellent.... I wonder at this point if they have access to anybody who actually hasn't got a dodgy past or has covered up shit?

[identity profile] mindstalk.livejournal.com 2013-03-14 05:55 am (UTC)(link)
What would it take to be a bishop who wasn't involved in covering up abusive priests, given the widespread nature of abuse and priest-transferring and the lack of any bishops having gone public?

[identity profile] daveon.livejournal.com 2013-03-14 03:21 pm (UTC)(link)
You might find some people who had 'weird' roles in fairly remote locations? But I'm actually drawing a blank. I suspect there isn't a bishop left who hasn't moved a priest due to suspicions they don't want addressed.

[identity profile] viktor-haag.livejournal.com 2013-03-15 04:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Without in any way excusing the "transfer to avoid scandal" behaviour, we should probably take note that this isn't restricted to the Catholic church (or even religious bureaucracies) by any stretch. You'd probably be hard pressed to find a school-board, hospital, government bureaucracy, or large corporation where the executive layer of management hasn't engaged in this kind of behaviour to one degree or another, especially where the possibility of actually bringing criminal charges to bear would be tricky and potentially very public.