james_davis_nicoll (
james_davis_nicoll) wrote2011-06-22 06:20 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
As pointed out in comments
ComicsAlliance Roundtable: The Fashion of the New DCU
Is it too early to call the coming reboot the longest comic book company suicide note in history?
Is it too early to call the coming reboot the longest comic book company suicide note in history?
no subject
Oh, God, why would anyone ever DO that to Harley Quinn's costume? It fails on every level, completely.
-- Taking something unique and making it generic
-- Taking something visually striking, almost iconic, and making it messy
-- Taking something sexy and making it trashy
-- Taking something that fits the character's personality and turning it into something the character would never wear except as a joke (probably the kind of joke where someone gets murdered at the end)
And finally,
-- Not understanding the basic physics of *how clothes work*, especially loosely-laced corsets, ie, THEY FALL OFF.
There isn't html powerful enough to make a frowny face big enough to indicate my displeasure here, so I'll just conclude, :(
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I might understand if people might yearn for finances of the varient cover bubble, but I didn't realize some considered it a creative peak.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Gun toting Techno mummies get no love I swear.
no subject
The problem with the Harley is that, unless she's literally walking across the bedroom towards the person or people she's about to have sex with, there's no way that outfit's going to work out for her. Even then, she's going to have to stop to awkwardly readjust before she gets to the bed, which means putting down the love hammer...That's some non-suspendable disbelief.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm intrigued by the denim socks he's wearing though.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-22 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)(Starring George Reeves, of course)
Bruce
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I do Not heart me some DC, given the... interesting...PR they're doing with all this.
no subject
[clicks link]
What. The. Fracking. Frell.
no subject
You know, the idea of a major reboot and revamp is fine. Even that map they showed me earlier was fine, if it actually followed through with the idea of a war among supers changing the world drastically. But this? This is goddamn 90s iron age crap. NOW I am giving up on the DC reboot.
no subject
And seriously, Jim Lee was new, fresh, and exciting in the early 90s, the age of Vanilla Ice, Ninja Turtles, MC Hammer, and Parker Lewis Can't Lose. It ought to be pointed out, however, that it's twenty effing years later. TWENTY. YEARS.
Harumph.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(I spend too much time overhearing my 15-year-old otaku and her friends' ideas of what is squee-worthy.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-24 21:33 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Plan possibly worth trying;
1: Find a good translator for French->english, belgian->english work.
2: Apply Haikasoru's buisnessmodel to comics.
3: Dance on DC and marvels graves.
4: Profit.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject