I admire how polite you are to the angry mainsplainer. The whole "I've read a list of rhetorical fallacies and will now use them in my strawman argument." is kind of cute, but the "criticism equals revenge" thing is annoyingly stupid.
No, I did not, because I was not referring to Ms. Johnson or her article directly. I was responding to the post, "Won't someone please think about the men!?" which was itself, I assume, an ironic comment.
Well, let's put it this way: I dislike participating in public lynch mobs. If that requires having idiots be angry, then, well, let the idiots be angry.
I'll trolled for you, since you don't afraid of any grammar difficulties. Also, self-awareness not an issue, but (to abandon the fractured grammar you seem to enjoy employing) I do enjoy making stupid people throw their stupidity into sharp relief for my own enjoyment.
Saying "Hahahaha no" isn't *actually* *exactly* the same as murdering someone in order to terrorise the segment of the population to whom s/he belongs. There's this subtle difference.
no subject
no subject
I shall labor under that misimpression no longer, and quite possibly become one of those tiresome Men's Rights advocates while I'm at it.
Under the No True Scotsman rule, I'd guess that the author of the article is also a tool of the evil patriarchy, right?
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's terribly easy to snark about how horrible people are behind their backs after all.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yeah, okay, you're just plain embarrassing.
no subject
no subject
Your attempts at trolling are painful to watch.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
JSYK. HTH, HAND.
no subject
no subject
Pot, kettle, black.
no subject
Me, I like black. It's the colour of a nice night sky where you can see the stars.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Ah, I wondered why this thread got to so many replies. Now I know.