Although the provisions of the Texas Annexation document allowing for the creation of four additional states are popularly regarded as a unique curiosity today, they were largely superfluous. Article IV, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution already specifically provided for the formation of new states through the junction or division of existing states
That would be one heck of a way to Gerrymander the Senate.
That said, some obvious candidate names would be North Texas, East Texas, West Texas, and South Texas. We already have West Virginia and South Carolina, so there's precedent for this mode of naming.
I can't find a map, but I am told that the five states were pre-defined. The one in the center was shaped like the current Texas, just smaller. The United Methodist Church split up the state into five districts, which match the pre-defined states.
Yes, though Tennessee was formed for North Carolina, and Kentucky from Virginia; the former was a county originally. So who knows what the smaller bits may choose to call themselves.
The resolution did include two unique provisions: first, it said that up to four additional states could be created from Texas' territory, with the consent of the State of Texas. (more wikipedia).
no subject
http://www.snopes.com/history/american/texas.asp
Also from that link:
That would be one heck of a way to Gerrymander the Senate.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I can't find a map, but I am told that the five states were pre-defined. The one in the center was shaped like the current Texas, just smaller. The United Methodist Church split up the state into five districts, which match the pre-defined states.
no subject
Texans have long (and selective) memories.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-04-16 07:33 pm (UTC)(link)The 5th
no subject
(Why, yes, it _is_ all about us.)
no subject
We'd never approve of splitting us up.