james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll ([personal profile] james_davis_nicoll) wrote2009-04-16 02:12 pm

About that Texas can split into four states thing

Which piece was to have kept the name Texas? What would the lesser fragments have been called?

[identity profile] grimjim.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 06:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Five states.
http://www.snopes.com/history/american/texas.asp

Also from that link:
Although the provisions of the Texas Annexation document allowing for the creation of four additional states are popularly regarded as a unique curiosity today, they were largely superfluous. Article IV, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution already specifically provided for the formation of new states through the junction or division of existing states
That would be one heck of a way to Gerrymander the Senate.

[identity profile] grimjim.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 06:18 pm (UTC)(link)
That said, some obvious candidate names would be North Texas, East Texas, West Texas, and South Texas. We already have West Virginia and South Carolina, so there's precedent for this mode of naming.

[identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 06:20 pm (UTC)(link)
But which one would be the real Texas?

[identity profile] scifantasy.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
In their own minds, they all would.
sraun: portrait (Default)

[personal profile] sraun 2009-04-16 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)
The one in the center?

I can't find a map, but I am told that the five states were pre-defined. The one in the center was shaped like the current Texas, just smaller. The United Methodist Church split up the state into five districts, which match the pre-defined states.

[identity profile] derekl1963.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 08:01 pm (UTC)(link)
No matter which one was anointed the 'real' Texas - there would be bar fights and school rivalries over it forever and a week.

Texans have long (and selective) memories.

[identity profile] roseembolism.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 06:25 pm (UTC)(link)
SO...which one would be the home of Glinda and the Winkies again?
seawasp: (Default)

[personal profile] seawasp 2009-04-16 07:02 pm (UTC)(link)
South.

[identity profile] dcseain.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 07:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, though Tennessee was formed for North Carolina, and Kentucky from Virginia; the former was a county originally. So who knows what the smaller bits may choose to call themselves.

(Anonymous) 2009-04-16 07:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Can't be East. East states are not allowed, it says so in the Bible.
hazelchaz: (Default)

The 5th

[personal profile] hazelchaz 2009-04-17 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
And name the one in the middle Central Texas. Or New Texas.

[identity profile] jhetley.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 06:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Had to set up the Constitution to allow Maine to separate from Massachusetts.

(Why, yes, it _is_ all about us.)

[identity profile] 0ccam.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)
The resolution did include two unique provisions: first, it said that up to four additional states could be created from Texas' territory, with the consent of the State of Texas. (more wikipedia).

We'd never approve of splitting us up.