james_davis_nicoll (
james_davis_nicoll) wrote2025-05-25 09:35 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Night Watch (Discworld, volume 29/City Watch, volume 6) by Terry Pratchett

A time-displaced cop struggles to protect history and the glorious revolution from a time-displaced psychopath, as well as from the cop's own better nature.
Night Watch (Discworld, volume 29/City Watch, volume 6) by Terry Pratchett
no subject
no subject
A few decades ago I decided to try Discworld and started reading in publication order. Off the top of my head I can't think of any Suck Fairy bait, but Guards! Guards! is where I hit my boredom threshold.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-05-26 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
But I think it's a mistake to try to read Interesting Times as riffing off of the real China when it's so obviously riffing off of low-information English Orientalist fantasies about China.
no subject
Very funny, *VERY* pointed. Satire so thick it stands on its own
no subject
The Discworld universe is divided into sub-series focused on different characters. You don't have to read the whole series in sequence. I think I might have a harder time reading the Vimes books now, just because I have a different attitude toward cops and police procedurals than I did when I read them. If Guards! Guards! didn't appeal (as to Patrick above), I might recommend reading more of the books about the witches or about Death.
no subject
no subject
I didn't and don't mind stories with objectionable protagonists as such - a big chunk of my TV watching is Britcrime, for some reason - and I read the first few witches and DEATH [1] books. I just didn't find anything in them I liked.
[1] As far as I can tell, markdown doesn't have a way to do small caps. Makes it impossible to properly name the only good operating system that has ever existed.
the first two
(It is Almost an oranges-and-kumquats kind of thing.) They have their own charm.
They are Not my favorites Now.
I just feel that it is not fair to judge them for being different..
Re: the first two
(Anonymous) 2025-05-26 03:55 pm (UTC)(link)V
(Anonymous) 2025-05-27 01:32 am (UTC)(link)Re: V
(Anonymous) 2025-05-27 07:10 pm (UTC)(link)Robert Carnegie
no subject
no subject
no subject