james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll ([personal profile] james_davis_nicoll) wrote2025-04-04 11:07 am

I can't believe it took me so long to think of this

There are many circumstances where we might need to count how many people are in the Theatre of Arts. It very belatedly occurred to me that there's a short-cut.



T of A is divided into clearly defined zones. If I know how many seats are in each zone, then it's possible to greatly reduce the amount of time needed for certain house counts.



For example, sometimes we rope off the sections at either side, which right there says there can be at most 246 people in the theatre.
patrick_morris_miller: Me, filking in front of mundanes (Default)

[personal profile] patrick_morris_miller 2025-04-04 04:09 pm (UTC)(link)

I guess capturing a few, counting and tagging them, releasing them back into the wild, waiting for them to mingle, then capturing some again and seeing what proportion are tagged wouldn't work at the time scale involved, huh.

sturgeonslawyer: (Default)

[personal profile] sturgeonslawyer 2025-04-04 05:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I think you made a typo; obviously you meant 246?
conuly: (Default)

[personal profile] conuly 2025-04-04 06:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Are you counting the ushers?
bolindbergh: (2)

[personal profile] bolindbergh 2025-04-05 02:59 am (UTC)(link)
The usual punchline is "Just count the feet and divide by two!"
thewayne: (Default)

[personal profile] thewayne 2025-04-05 06:20 pm (UTC)(link)
This may be a silly approach, but if you know how many seats can be occupied, can't you just count the empties and subtract?
scott_sanford: (Default)

[personal profile] scott_sanford 2025-04-05 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought of that.