Artificial torpor

[james_davis_nicoll]

Apparently they've induced hibernation in animals that don't normally hiberate.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4469793.stm

Comments

Re: AAAGGGGHHHHH!!!!!

[liveavatar.livejournal.com]

I was thinking of countries other than Canada, but of course you're right that sheer acreage isn't the problem at the moment. The question is what we're willing to put up with. How inhospitable an environment will people accept in large numbers? Here in the US, for instance, how high will gas prices have to rise until people stop buying SUVs, for example? Some people say $3/gallon, I'm betting on $4.

Interesting tradeoff idea: sure, you can have the immortality formula, but you have to live on Ellesmere Island. Hibernating.

Re: AAAGGGGHHHHH!!!!!

[james-nicoll.livejournal.com]

There's no part of Canada that will kill you dead as quickly as any place in the system off Earth. If you can settle Mars, Manitoba should be easy.

Re: AAAGGGGHHHHH!!!!!

[liveavatar.livejournal.com]

You're paying for the prestige address. I mean, which is more hip, a cryo-condo in Manitoba or a Sattlemeier disk house in Amazonis Planitia?
"Dahling, all the best people are moving to Tharsis."

Okay, getting serious for just a moment: the thing about settling any part of Mars, even the dodgy part, is that it's making history. People will pay with time, money, elbow grease, and family ties for the privilege of settling there. Not only that, they'll know they're in for long-term hardship and therefore won't expect much from their surroundings. But for a lot of the hardy pioneers, the wilds of Manitoba might be simultaneously too near and too far.

I'm already distracting myself from other work by posting here, or I'd look up what people expect from life in Siberia these days.

Re: AAAGGGGHHHHH!!!!!

[james-nicoll.livejournal.com]

'm already distracting myself from other work by posting here, or I'd look up what people expect from life in Siberia these days.

A ticket to any place warm, is my impression.

Oil Prices

[james-nicoll.livejournal.com]

You can price the maximum cost that oil is likely to reach by looking at the cost of synthesizing it directly from air, water and some source of energy. BOTECs put the energy cost of assembling a barrel of oil from raw materials at around $70.00 [1] or about 50% higher than the present price of oil. Obviously we're unlikely to be able to turn electricity into oil with 100% efficiency but on the other hand, there are shortcuts we can take to avoid making oil from the most basic raw materials. It seems to me reasonable to expect prices to be stable at no more than twice the present cost. Oh, sure, short term shoartages may cause temporary price surges but I don't expect that to last.

How much of the price of gasoline is taxes? Perhaps if the economic effect of high energy costs is undesirable, the tax on gasoline could be relaxed a little, to be replaced by (something comic and highly repressive: fill this in later).


1: The problem is that the Saudis can produce a barrel of oil for much, much less than %70.00.