ext_17617 ([identity profile] glaurung-quena.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] james_davis_nicoll 2016-04-27 07:12 am (UTC)

So this year, we have legit nominations who got on the ballot through their own merit, puppy crap (vox day as best editor, give me a break), and then we have good quality works that got on due to puppies nominating them in an effort to spoil things.

I guess the last category should be called "puppy pee-on" nominees.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org