As an anthropologist of religion, I have a whole *different* set of complicated hand- and foot- and pseudopod- waving about Jung, because he sort of straddles the psych/anth/religionist line, but this is distinctly outwith the present scope.
It can be largely summed up as "he's good for what he's good for, which is a fairly restricted area, but occasionally he's VERY good. Outside that scope, he can be very bad indeed."
And yeah, I was thinking of the job app thing. Ugh, No. No, No, No.
no subject
As an anthropologist of religion, I have a whole *different* set of complicated hand- and foot- and pseudopod- waving about Jung, because he sort of straddles the psych/anth/religionist line, but this is distinctly outwith the present scope.
It can be largely summed up as "he's good for what he's good for, which is a fairly restricted area, but occasionally he's VERY good. Outside that scope, he can be very bad indeed."
And yeah, I was thinking of the job app thing. Ugh, No. No, No, No.