james_davis_nicoll (
james_davis_nicoll) wrote2015-10-27 11:04 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Something I don't understand
Why the change from having Jonathan Kent support Superman's career as a hero to opposing it?
Supergirl, as I recall, has always had someone trying to discourage her. In the old days it was Superman. And I cannot recall if the Danvers had any idea she was Supergirl; they may not have had the option to support or discourage her.
Not that comic book characters age in real time but if she was 16 in her first 1959 appearance, Supergirl would have become an adult at a very interesting time for women's rights in the US...
Supergirl, as I recall, has always had someone trying to discourage her. In the old days it was Superman. And I cannot recall if the Danvers had any idea she was Supergirl; they may not have had the option to support or discourage her.
Not that comic book characters age in real time but if she was 16 in her first 1959 appearance, Supergirl would have become an adult at a very interesting time for women's rights in the US...
no subject
I also commented on the lack of "Superman" -- but they did say "Man of Steel." And "Supergirl," of course. I have no idea why they aren't saying it -- the contortions were fairly clumsy and obvious.
I'll keep watching for a bit, but I also still watch Arrow, so you know I've low standards.
no subject