She reviewed many of my books. Most of them had a strange, hallucinogenic aspect to them that indicated she just skimmed and read the back copy, but ONE of them she had clearly read in depth, and liked, and gave a pretty detailed review of.
From memory, I think it was "Rule 34". Lots of Scottish dialect, multi-viewpoint second person present tense, crimes that don't exist yet, and with two exceptions all the characters were LGBTQ.
I think it challenged her expectations somewhat. (She thought she was eating a chocolate chip cookie and discovered she'd bitten into a pickled onion.)
Are you counting the AI as one of the non-LGBTQ characters? Because if not, I can't think of the one that isn't the Toymaker. Multiple second person, while fun to read, made it difficult for me to coherently remember minor characters.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Really??
Which one, if I may ask? I don't think I've ever SEEN a negative Klausner review.
no subject
And I'm surprised her obit doesn't say she was also a space vampire who became a pirate to search for her lost dragon.
no subject
Re: Really??
I think it challenged her expectations somewhat. (She thought she was eating a chocolate chip cookie and discovered she'd bitten into a pickled onion.)
no subject
Do you mind if I steal that sentence and turn it into a novel?
It's what she'd have wanted.
no subject
no subject
P.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Re: Really??
no subject