As I understand it, that was the Supreme Court finally giving up on Congress to get its act together to clarify a statute. An eight-to-one decision, great but not WOOOOOOO great, if that makes sense?
This case, the concept of disparate impact has been found constitutional and honest jurisprudence now has to accommodate it. (Hackery won't, but that goes with the territory.)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
james_davis_nicoll) wrote2015-06-26 10:22 am
no subject
This case, the concept of disparate impact has been found constitutional and honest jurisprudence now has to accommodate it. (Hackery won't, but that goes with the territory.)
no subject