[identity profile] vschanoes.livejournal.com 2014-06-26 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Grooms were not substantially older than the brides in Shakespeare's time in England as a matter of course. Marrying in the early to mid-twenties was, if memory serves, the norm for both men and women (excluding, of course, nobility, whose marriages, as you note, about statecraft and property--most people didn't have enough property to have to worry about such things).

[identity profile] graydon saunders (from livejournal.com) 2014-06-27 04:39 pm (UTC)(link)
My recollection is that if the average age of first marriage was, say, 25, for the brides, it would be 28 or so for the grooms. I perhaps should not have called that "substantial" but there does seem to be an "older groom" bias.

[identity profile] vschanoes.livejournal.com 2014-06-27 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, agreed. There's a consistent difference; it's just usually not very big.