[identity profile] w. dow rieder (from livejournal.com) 2014-05-16 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
A starship that might actually get live people to another star in 100 years? That's... a bit of a challenge. We have only the barest clue *today* how to go about building a self-contained structure that could get live people to a spot it never moved from, 100 years later.

So even "it's all a hoax, it's really a glorified fallout shelter" isn't all that plausible.

"It's secretly an alien zoo ship" would actually be the most believable for me.

But then I'm very far from the target audience.

[identity profile] keithmm.livejournal.com 2014-05-17 02:28 am (UTC)(link)
But if it's a hoaxed ship, the self-contained environmental system doesn't have to be self contained. Just rig up some black-box technobabble water and air treatment system that amazingly never breaks down and only has to have the filters replaced once a year. They just don't see that the pipes go into the black box and make a right turn to the water treatment plant and air vents on the surface.

[identity profile] scott-sanford.livejournal.com 2014-05-17 03:21 am (UTC)(link)
If it's got a life support system for hundreds of people, it's likely to have a truly vast number of pipes and valves and boxes and tubes and tanks... Stuff that doesn't break down can go un-messed-with and unnoticed pretty much forever.

The best place to hide a needle is in a stack of needles.

[identity profile] w. dow rieder (from livejournal.com) 2014-05-17 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
True. Implausible, but less implausible than the other possibilities. Not, I suspect, what the shows producers would want, though.

[identity profile] maruad.livejournal.com 2014-05-17 04:22 am (UTC)(link)
10,000 people sold to aliens, without the colonist/human zoo critters knowledge, in exchange for alien technology?
Edited 2014-05-17 04:22 (UTC)

[identity profile] w. dow rieder (from livejournal.com) 2014-05-17 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
I was thinking more "Gosh, these humans are likely to blow up their planet and go extinct in the wild. If we want to preserve a viable population, we better act now. But let's put them in an environment that makes sense to them, so they don't freak."

[identity profile] maruad.livejournal.com 2014-05-17 06:04 am (UTC)(link)
That works as well.