ext_350082 ([identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] james_davis_nicoll 2014-04-26 04:56 am (UTC)

No, not really. The very act of calling it "reverse sexism" denies the reality that sexism is sexism no matter who does it.

That being said, whoever chose a man to do that cover, for that book, was too stupid to be allowed out of the house, let alone into a publishing job.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org