Hokkyoku Nigo is part of a small subset in Japan with a fetish for wearing outfits called “zentai” — an abbreviation of “zenshintaitsu”, which means “full body suit” — who say they are seeking liberation by effacing the physical self.
bruce munro (from livejournal.com)2014-04-19 06:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Liberating, but I wouldn't call it self-effacing. A full black burqua with veil? That's self-effacing (except maybe somewhere very liberal :)). This is self-expression, with visible nipples.
Shrug. I'm not zentainonen, nor the translator who provided the english phrase "self-effacing", but even though the whole experience is foreign to me, I can see how putting one's carefully constructed social face aside can be both self-effacing and liberating.
After all, don't proponents of burqua and other forms of hijab claim that it does liberate them in ways that the make-up and clothing conventions of Europe and North America do not?
I can often see nipples under western clothes, if I'm boorish enough to look (and I am that boorish, far too often); does this mean that a woman can't be self-effacing at all when wearing western clothes?
While I'm being boorish, I note that among the seven figures above, I can only see one pair of nipples, and to be frank, they weren't obvious to me. Does this mean that the zentainonen in red is not being self-effacing, while the others are? Do male nipples count as being as auto-unself-effacing as female nipples? Are your feelings about nipples (male or female) necessarily the same as a typical Japanese?
There's skepticism, and there's refusing to take the stated word of someone from a different culture about their psychology because their culture is different.
Edit: If you're saying that if you were wearing a zentai outfit, you wouldn't be self-effacing, then that's fair enough; but if you're saying that someone else couldn't be self-effacing because you wouldn't be, then that's just absurd.
There are at least some places where the traditional color is not black, and when that's combined with it being a matter of personal choice rather than government mandate, from what I hear the tendency is towards very fashion-forward (if not adhering to European/North American fashion) combinations. One of my US-born-and-raised friends who studies feminist activism in the Arabic world has mentioned feeling generally underdressed, not in amount of clothing but in coordination and effort -- as the foreigner, she is the one whose handbag and headscarf do not go together and might not be ruined by a dip in the mud.
Nod. If you do a Google image search for "hijab fashion" you can see plenty of fabrics as colourful as the fabrics above. Does this mean that the women wearing them are not being modest, as per local custom? If, by chance, a stray lock of hair escaped their scarves would that destroy any claim to hijab-moderated modesty? If so, when did we become the Morality Police for foreign cultures?
no subject
no subject
After all, don't proponents of burqua and other forms of hijab claim that it does liberate them in ways that the make-up and clothing conventions of Europe and North America do not?
no subject
no subject
While I'm being boorish, I note that among the seven figures above, I can only see one pair of nipples, and to be frank, they weren't obvious to me. Does this mean that the zentainonen in red is not being self-effacing, while the others are? Do male nipples count as being as auto-unself-effacing as female nipples? Are your feelings about nipples (male or female) necessarily the same as a typical Japanese?
There's skepticism, and there's refusing to take the stated word of someone from a different culture about their psychology because their culture is different.
Edit: If you're saying that if you were wearing a zentai outfit, you wouldn't be self-effacing, then that's fair enough; but if you're saying that someone else couldn't be self-effacing because you wouldn't be, then that's just absurd.
no subject
no subject