I suspect that it's more lazy editing - the writer wouldn't have chosen the photograph or, probably, the headline.
And there's a hint of a connection to the article's topic, since Walter mentions Mary Shelley, and this picture is taken from the recent theater production of Frankenstein.
Honestly? I would have thought a lot, but I could be wrong.
And in a way I do think that the picture illustrates the article's point. I'm trying to think of a sufficiently recognizable woman whose picture would be even tangentially related to the article's topic, and I'm drawing a blank.
You know there are people who try to claim she didn't write it? Because it's famous and women cannot have written famous books. Other people defend her authorship by claiming it's kind of a crap book and of course women can have written those.
Oh, come now! Frankenstein was written by Percy Bysshe Shelley! He was under a bit of a cloud in the UK at the time for being an Atheist so he published it under her name!
Do you suppose that Gabriel Rossetti wrote Goblin Market or are women allowed to be poets?
Professor Jim Machor at Kansas State tried to teach us that when I was his student in the mid 1990s. In fact, he would pull crap like assigning the female students "women's books" for their final papers, and teaching books like The Lamplighter to surreptitiously prove that women all wrote junk that was popular but without merit.
I figured it wasn't an accident that Machor was "accidentally" spelled "Mac Hor" in our course listings the entire time I attended KSU.
I could criticise it for being over clever, but yeah, I think most skiffy fans are aware that Mary Shelley invented the genre and would get the Frankenstein connection at some point while reading the article, even if they're not aware that media heart-throb Cummerbund was performing the role currently.
bruce munro (from livejournal.com)2013-08-08 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Me three: I thought "some sort of post-apocalyptic scenario" at first look, because since when does Frankie Jr. have 1 giant scar randomly running slantways across his face like that? Did the good doctor have some sort of peculiar cavalry-saber related accident while putting him together? Don't know what's with the "bald" look, either...
It was a fairly prominent UK theatre production, and the Guardian is a UK-based newspaper, so I think it's not completely off-base for them to assume readers would get the reference.
(Also, the actual story has a caption for the image, which explains what it's from.)
I only knew it because I was aware that Benedict Cumberbatch and Jonny Lee Miller were in Danny Boyle's FRANKENSTEIN play a couple seasons ago, in which they traded off roles as the Monster and Frankenstein.
So... yeah. I recognized it from CONTEXT, not from anything inherent.
no subject
And there's a hint of a connection to the article's topic, since Walter mentions Mary Shelley, and this picture is taken from the recent theater production of Frankenstein.
no subject
Intentional or not, it does fit the topic quite well.
no subject
And in a way I do think that the picture illustrates the article's point. I'm trying to think of a sufficiently recognizable woman whose picture would be even tangentially related to the article's topic, and I'm drawing a blank.
no subject
no subject
no subject
;)
Yes, I think a picture of Sigourney Weaver wielding a flame-thrower would have had sufficient recognition.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-09 08:18 pm (UTC)(link)William Hyde
no subject
Do you suppose that Gabriel Rossetti wrote Goblin Market or are women allowed to be poets?
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I figured it wasn't an accident that Machor was "accidentally" spelled "Mac Hor" in our course listings the entire time I attended KSU.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Also, the actual story has a caption for the image, which explains what it's from.)
no subject
So... yeah. I recognized it from CONTEXT, not from anything inherent.