james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll ([personal profile] james_davis_nicoll) wrote2011-02-19 06:31 pm

Apparently "Eddie Izzard is in it" is enough for me to put movies in my queue

What do people think of the 2009 BBC version of Day of the Triffids?

[identity profile] barberio.livejournal.com 2011-02-19 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a "re-imagining" of the original rather than an adaptation, and not in a particularly good way. Eddie Izzard gets to be in it's first really really really stupid set piece.

[identity profile] daveon.livejournal.com 2011-02-19 07:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Er... it wasn't all that good really.
ext_6388: Avon from Blake's 7 fails to show an emotion (Default)

[identity profile] fridgepunk.livejournal.com 2011-02-19 07:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Let me just explain the backstory for the setting: global warming has been solved by having genetically engineered triffids produce oil.

So keep sharp objects away from you while watching.
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)

[personal profile] matgb 2011-02-19 08:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I weatched the first episode on broadcast. Despite having iPlayer on my TV, and being something of a fan of both the book and previous adaptations when I was a kid, I strangely managed to miss the later episodes.

Very high production standards and budget, with an excellent cast. All wasted from what I saw. It's possible it got better, but reviews and blogs said otherwise.

[identity profile] terheyt.livejournal.com 2011-02-19 08:33 pm (UTC)(link)
It's awful. Utterly atrocious. Hour-long-rant-worthy.

Great production values, but the changed the story to involve magical mystical jungle shamans, emo eye make-up induced by self-poisoning, and triffid tentacles so strong that handlers need to carry tazers.

Right. Not getting started again. But do yourself a favour and re-read the book.

[identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/krin_o_o_/ 2011-02-19 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)
So basically it's a valiant but doomed and wasted effort on the part of all parties except the writers and producers who insisted on a badly scripted Eco-rant against big corps using fraken-plants as the strawmen to move the rather spare plot along?

[identity profile] puritybrown.livejournal.com 2011-02-20 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
Others have touched on the problems introduced into the story in the course of adaptation, so I will just add: I could have lived with the travesty they'd made of Wyndham's story if it hadn't been so incredibly dull. Despite having quite a lot of action and high dramatic scenes, the show was let down by a script that was so on-the-nose that it might as well have been banging every audience member on the head with a sledgehammer. No subtlety, no layers, and no possibility of letting the audience think for a microsecond. There was nothing to think about: everything was laid out with the most excruciating obviousness.

[identity profile] michaelgr.livejournal.com 2011-02-20 09:07 am (UTC)(link)
You'd be less bored watching actual plants grow than watching these modern triffids. It's dull and silly and not even unintentionally funny.

[identity profile] pauldormer.livejournal.com 2011-02-20 01:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Saw the first half. Didn't bother with the second.

[identity profile] viktor-haag.livejournal.com 2011-02-20 05:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Meh.