james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll ([personal profile] james_davis_nicoll) wrote2009-02-12 04:37 pm

In light of 2012

[Poll #1348318]

Clarification: I did mean simultaneously.

[identity profile] ertchin.livejournal.com 2009-02-15 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I picked 2050 because A) it's a semi-round number, and B) I enjoy being optimistic about sending unmanned stuff into space. But I certainly am not envisioning NASA (or The Big Governmental Space Agency of 2050) having 8 simultaneous orbiters.