james_davis_nicoll (
james_davis_nicoll
) wrote
2009
-
02
-
12
04:37 pm
In light of 2012
[
Poll #1348318
]
Clarification: I did mean simultaneously.
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
ertchin.livejournal.com
2009-02-15 11:06 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I picked 2050 because A) it's a semi-round number, and B) I enjoy being optimistic about sending unmanned stuff into space. But I certainly am not envisioning NASA (or The Big Governmental Space Agency of 2050) having 8 simultaneous orbiters.
42 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject