jbwoodford: (Default)
jbwoodford ([personal profile] jbwoodford) wrote in [personal profile] james_davis_nicoll 2023-01-26 06:01 pm (UTC)

The fact that they were marketing a game as an Indiana Jones tie-in is its own symptom of a drive to monetize/expand their reach. They didn't try to do a generic swashbuckling 30s-40s adventure game, even though they'd already produced Gangbusters!--they did an Indiana Jones game. They didn't do a submarine warfare wargame--they did a Hunt for Red October game. Like Hasbro/WotC, they were trying to expand their market, and IIRC the games they produced weren't that good.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org