Not have both making decisions? Iceland and Finland seem like possibilities. Both have significant extractive industries. (Though "extractive" and "petrostate" may be getting conflated here.)
Ontario has a doctrinaire mammonite premier; he's not a dominionist. (Dominionist back-benchers are a thing.) So it's possible to attack Dougie for not being sufficiently mammonite (the surprisingly labour-friendly removal of anti-competitive clauses under his government, for example) but not for being insufficiently pious. (People would laugh.) (Whereas we do see dominionist US politicians being attacked for insufficient piety and this having political consequence.)
Both are flavours of denying facts; they're not that far apart in some senses. But the social constructions and thereby the appropriate tactics with which to oppose them do differ.
no subject
Not really an option; the religious authoritarian fossil carbon money is global, and really persistent.
(Note that it's why we had Harper.) No power structure able to make them stop doing what they're doing is to be tolerated.
no subject
no subject
There's a difference between a mammonite and a dominionist.
Not a major structural difference, but I think relevant in operational terms.
no subject
no subject
Not have both? Challenging.
Not have both making decisions? Iceland and Finland seem like possibilities. Both have significant extractive industries. (Though "extractive" and "petrostate" may be getting conflated here.)
Ontario has a doctrinaire mammonite premier; he's not a dominionist. (Dominionist back-benchers are a thing.) So it's possible to attack Dougie for not being sufficiently mammonite (the surprisingly labour-friendly removal of anti-competitive clauses under his government, for example) but not for being insufficiently pious. (People would laugh.) (Whereas we do see dominionist US politicians being attacked for insufficient piety and this having political consequence.)
Both are flavours of denying facts; they're not that far apart in some senses. But the social constructions and thereby the appropriate tactics with which to oppose them do differ.