graydon: (Default)

[personal profile] graydon 2020-10-11 02:06 pm (UTC)(link)

That's an impressively terrible cover.

These (there are two!) are mood books; if you poke at the scenery or try to make the world-building make sense you're going to wind up covered in paper mache and regret. There are moments in them when the mood works anyway.

(Anonymous) 2020-10-11 02:54 pm (UTC)(link)
The lower-right cover, that log raft is floating implausibly well. I don't think the artist understands how heavy bears and moose are.

--
Nathan H.
graydon: (Default)

[personal profile] graydon 2020-10-11 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)

The copy I had was the first one on the second row; not peak Whelan, but pretty good as these things go. (I mean, it's not especially convincing tack, but it is at least tack.)

graydon: (Default)

[personal profile] graydon 2020-10-11 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)

I was using "peak Whelan" as a stand-in for "high end cover"[1], rather than trying to identify the cover as a Whelan, which I am pretty sure it isn't.

[1]Julian May's "The Nonborn King" has a great cover, whatever you think of the book. That kind of "peak Whelan" cover.

chrysostom: (Default)

[personal profile] chrysostom 2020-10-14 05:22 pm (UTC)(link)
James is right, that's a DKS.
davidgoldfarb: (Default)

[personal profile] davidgoldfarb 2020-10-14 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
I concur, it's definitely a Sweet.