gingicat: deep purple lilacs, some buds, some open (geeky-library)

[personal profile] gingicat 2020-01-26 06:08 pm (UTC)(link)
It is not my favorite L'Engle. I do adore the other book with Adam in it, A Ring of Endless Light, which is one of the Vicky Austin books.
Edited 2020-01-27 10:53 (UTC)
marthawells: (The Serpent Sea)

[personal profile] marthawells 2020-01-26 06:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I remember reading this as a kid and being furious at the ending.
jreynolds197: A dinosaur. (Default)

[personal profile] jreynolds197 2020-01-26 06:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Polyhymnia? The muse of sacred poetry, also known as "the one of many hymns"?

OR

Interested in polyamory, but only with men. "The one of many hims"?

Thanks, I'll see myself out.
anne: (Default)

[personal profile] anne 2020-01-26 06:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I remember being really mad because I thought it would be about Meg's daughter, maybe with Meg in it too! Alas. And forty years later it appears that I'm still mad! Some grudges are worth it.
lil_shepherd: (Default)

[personal profile] lil_shepherd 2020-01-26 07:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Not one of her best...

(Anonymous) 2020-01-26 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't know this before checking, but according to WikiP ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Quintet ), Polyhymnia is Meg's daughter.

I read the first 3 of the Time series, and bounced hard off of "Many Waters", and I don't think I read anything else by L'Engle.
mindstalk: (Default)

[personal profile] mindstalk 2020-01-26 09:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I just remember trying to read this or a related book and wondering where all the cool stuff from Wind In The Door et al. had gone to.

Time Quintet? 5 books? Huh, I'd never heard of An Acceptable Time. Is it any good?
anne: (Default)

[personal profile] anne 2020-01-26 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)
^ that, yes.

(Anonymous) 2020-01-26 09:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Not great. Better than "Many Waters"

[personal profile] ba_munronoe 2020-01-26 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)
"Calvin is convinced that his research could be as dangerous as the atomic bomb. Why it would be dangerous is not clear."

Maybe she was thinking something like this?

"It's no good, Mac! Even if you blow the Red troops to pieces, each piece grows into a new Red!"
elusis: (Default)

[personal profile] elusis 2020-01-27 05:41 am (UTC)(link)
I'm carrying it right along with you. This book was awful.
lil_shepherd: (Default)

[personal profile] lil_shepherd 2020-01-27 08:47 am (UTC)(link)
Seconded. But most books are better than 'Many Waters'. I honestly think that 'The Young Unicorns' is L'Engle's best book.
gingicat: deep purple lilacs, some buds, some open (Default)

[personal profile] gingicat 2020-01-27 10:53 am (UTC)(link)
The former.
gingicat: deep purple lilacs, some buds, some open (Default)

[personal profile] gingicat 2020-01-27 10:55 am (UTC)(link)
It was written earlier, IIRC. It was certainly written before others in the Time Trilogy.

Edit: Nope, I am wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madeleine_L%27Engle
Edited 2020-01-27 11:00 (UTC)
gingicat: deep purple lilacs, some buds, some open (Default)

[personal profile] gingicat 2020-01-27 10:55 am (UTC)(link)
I do really like that one.

Speaking of Many Waters

(Anonymous) 2020-01-27 05:27 pm (UTC)(link)
https://the-toast.net/2015/05/12/many-waters/
ethelmay: (Default)

[personal profile] ethelmay 2020-01-28 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
Dragons in the Waters had no dragons, and The Young Unicorns no unicorns. ETA: for that matter, A Wrinkle in Time had no wrinkles in time, only in space. At least this one does have starfish?
Edited 2020-01-28 19:41 (UTC)
bunsen_h: (Default)

[personal profile] bunsen_h 2020-01-28 03:49 am (UTC)(link)
That article mentions something in that series that I'd never heard of before: "Intergalactic P.S. 3". It looks like an odd prototype for A Wind in the Door.
Edited 2020-01-28 03:49 (UTC)
bunsen_h: (Default)

[personal profile] bunsen_h 2020-01-28 03:54 am (UTC)(link)
Regeneration, especially if it enormously increased the human lifespan, would be extraordinarily disruptive to social structures. And if it was implemented without big changes to how we work with our planet, the environmental results would be catastrophic. I mean, worse than we're currently facing.
austin_dern: Actually predating the Tron sequel.  You can tell by how the chest patterns look. (Tron)

[personal profile] austin_dern 2020-01-28 05:15 am (UTC)(link)
Well, on a smaller problem scale, if it's easy and quick enough to regenerate body parts, then it's less of a problem to send your armies in more often, and to have them fight more brutally.

(Anonymous) 2020-01-30 12:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Immortality would change the annual rate of world population growth from 130 million - 50 million = 80 million to 130 million - 0 million = 130 million. If you're not bothered by the first, you shouldn't be bothered by the second.

I think the graphic at the beginning of "Torchwood: Miracle Day" represents a common belief that births and deaths are in a fine balance such that, if people stop dying, the population rate will suddenly zoom up by a multiple of the current rate.
del: (Default)

[personal profile] del 2020-01-30 12:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Immortality would change the annual rate of world population growth from 130 million - 50 million = 80 million to 130 million - 0 million = 130 million. If you're not bothered by the first, you shouldn't be bothered by the second.

I think the graphic at the beginning of "Torchwood: Miracle Day" represents a common belief that births and deaths are in a fine balance such that, if people stop dying, the population rate will suddenly zoom up by a multiple of the current rate.
bunsen_h: (Default)

[personal profile] bunsen_h 2020-01-30 05:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, I *am* bothered by the first, but I didn't know that the numbers worked out that way. Thank you.