james_davis_nicoll (
james_davis_nicoll
) wrote
2008
-
05
-
01
10:51 am
Back to something from last year
So did Dark Horse eventually come out with their
Gor
reprint or did they drop it?
Threaded
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
stephenshevlin.livejournal.com
2008-05-01 03:00 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I believe it very quietly dropped from their schedules.
Stephen Shevlin
no subject
mckitterick.livejournal.com
2008-05-01 04:00 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Tragic. I know a bunch of fans who would buy multiple copies of them. Y'know, one for the bookshelf and one for the bedroom....
no subject
sclerotic-rings.livejournal.com
2008-05-01 04:22 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
More than a few for the bedroom, seeing as how they'd tend to get their pages glued together...
no subject
james-nicoll.livejournal.com
2008-05-01 04:37 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Given the Ringo novels, I wonder why Baen hasn't picked up the rights to Gor.
no subject
carloshasanax.livejournal.com
2008-05-01 04:51 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Too liberal.
no subject
roseembolism.livejournal.com
2008-05-01 05:47 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Cue major rant by an all-new "no, i'm not really the same Gor fan that was posting here earlier" Gor fan in 3...2...1...
(Though that countdown should really be in weeks or months...)
no subject
jeffreyab.livejournal.com
2008-05-01 07:54 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Toni Weisskopf is not Jim Baen?
no subject
james-nicoll.livejournal.com
2008-05-01 08:04 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Baen is still doing Ringo's books, right? So this may be a difference that doesn't make a difference.
no subject
lederhosen.livejournal.com
2008-05-01 10:52 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Plus one for the bathroom.
no subject
zeborah
2008-05-02 04:04 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I find toilet paper more comfortable.
no subject
fallenpegasus
2008-05-02 06:02 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I've never read a Gor book. Odds are good I never will. (I did see the movie, but that's because MST3K did it...)
Why all the anger and angst about it maybe getting republished?
Are they somehow "dangerous"? Destructive of civil morals? Corruptors of the fair youth?
Since when was "that's just icky" an acceptable argument?
11 comments
Post a new comment
Threaded
|
Top-Level Comments Only
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
Stephen Shevlin
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Though that countdown should really be in weeks or months...)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Why all the anger and angst about it maybe getting republished?
Are they somehow "dangerous"? Destructive of civil morals? Corruptors of the fair youth?
Since when was "that's just icky" an acceptable argument?