james_davis_nicoll (
james_davis_nicoll) wrote2008-02-10 12:27 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Place Holder
I was going to put a rant here but I think it would be prudent for me to wait a month until the book that triggered it sees print. Even if I friends-lock it, that doesn't mean the publisher might not get wind of my comments and take offense.
So, to fill the time until then:
Is writing Heinlein young adult novel pastiches primarily a male occupation? I can't off-hand think of a female writer who tried her hand at a Heinlein young adult novel, at least not in the centenary wave of Heinlein pastiches.
[This might be a stupid question but if it is mainly a guy subgenre, why would that be?]
In a unrelated comment, metric _or_ American imitation of Imperial, people. Not both or at least not both in the same sentence.
So, to fill the time until then:
Is writing Heinlein young adult novel pastiches primarily a male occupation? I can't off-hand think of a female writer who tried her hand at a Heinlein young adult novel, at least not in the centenary wave of Heinlein pastiches.
[This might be a stupid question but if it is mainly a guy subgenre, why would that be?]
In a unrelated comment, metric _or_ American imitation of Imperial, people. Not both or at least not both in the same sentence.
no subject
no subject
And I find myself using both when writing in LJ and email lists sometimes, knowing people of both flavors will be reading; and a character in a book might possibly get away with that as well (though of course Twain's Dictum applies).
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Something That I Did Not Know When I Woke Up
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
But I would agree that there's certainly more Heinlein YA pastiches out there written by male writers.
Yes, but here's a counter-example
It's definitely a Heinlein juvenile, complete with a twist ending that you'll spot from thirty pages out.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2008-02-10 20:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2008-02-12 16:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Metric is, of course, infinitely more sensible and easier to use. I'm not defending the U.S. system, I'm just saying it was the one I absorbed.
(Speaking of abuses of unit systems, when I was in college I worked out the conversion factor for measuring gas mileage in inverse-nanoacres. Also someone pointed out to me that a "barn-yard atmosphere" is a unit of energy.)
I remember when the U.S. did make a push to switch to metric; for a while, all the road signs gave distances in both miles and kilometers. It never caught on, unless -- as Dave Barry pointed out -- you count the increasing popularity of the 9mm bullet.
There was also a brief period when a lot of gas stations were dispensing gas in liters; but that was because the price of gas had just gone over $0.99 for the first time, and the older pumps weren't capable of charging more than 99 cents per unit of gas measured out. But apparently you could change how much gas was measured out per what-you-charged, so a lot of stations adjusted their pumps to liters temporarily and posted conversion charts so people could work out how many gallons they'd just bought. Why they didn't go to measuring gas by quarts I don't know; but in any event as soon as everyone had bought new pumps capable of charging higher prices, everything went back to gallons.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2008-02-11 01:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2008-02-10 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)Temperatures inside the house, on thermostats and so on, are uniformly given in Farenheit. Temperatures outside the house, on the other hand, are always Celsius.
It sounds like if you and I ever had a conversation with numbers in it, I would wind up beaten to death with a shovel. :)
- Ken
no subject
Also ones that make it obvious that whoever wrote them has no feel for the metric system but this they do: they keep referring to numbers of grams for actual physical objects such that it's clear that someone decided that, just as a liter is close to a quart, and a yard is close to a meter, a gram must be close to an ounce (!). *sigh* If they just had no feel for metric and knew it, it wouldn't be a problem--it's easy enough to look up conversions and use a calculator, or nowadays, ask Google.
no subject
I see you've never bought car tyres. Or tires.
For example, take the dimension 225/50-VR16
225 mm width, height 50% of said width
16 inch diameter...
no subject
And now for something completely different....
http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=1083
no subject
no subject
Because we were technical people, we knew that "resolution" was not technically accurate. We thought that the term "dottage" (parallel to existing terms like "grammage") was ugly and confusing. After quite a long struggle to find something that made sense and that met the ISO requirements, we settled on naming the item "dots per inch", defined as "dots per 25,4mm", but ISO was canny and stomped on it hard.
MAO