Vaguely baffled
Apr. 28th, 2014 09:47 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Pharyngula disagrees with spending priorities in the US.
1: Excessive education causes undesirable frequency of class ascension by the lower classes, who will then want stuff like voting rights and not being treated like property. Why should people already at the top want this?
2: Outspending everyone else combined militarily is peacock feathers for great powers.
3: While it seems likely much of official policy in intended to provide enough dead bodies to prevent the universe from collapsing every 52 years, not everything the US does is disliked by the people on the receiving end:
1: Excessive education causes undesirable frequency of class ascension by the lower classes, who will then want stuff like voting rights and not being treated like property. Why should people already at the top want this?
2: Outspending everyone else combined militarily is peacock feathers for great powers.
3: While it seems likely much of official policy in intended to provide enough dead bodies to prevent the universe from collapsing every 52 years, not everything the US does is disliked by the people on the receiving end:
no subject
Date: 2014-04-28 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-28 03:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-28 04:18 pm (UTC)Helping countries that are being invaded by neighbors - an absolute must.
Stopping genocide - go Team USA!
Getting involved with purely internal conflicts in countries that, though run by not-so-nice dictators, don't actively involve mass murder - not such a hot idea.
If the US cuts military spending and stops getting involved with the first two situations, it'll create doubts in Japan, South Korea and our NATO allies about our willingness to support them. And that's the problem with PZ's graph -- Japan and Poland might have a tiny defense budget, but they can only get away with it because they're sure the US has their back. If the US cut military spending to the level of China, you'd see a lot of other countries increase theirs.
no subject
Date: 2014-04-28 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-28 06:49 pm (UTC)Edit: Oh, and it also costs more if you want to limit civilian casualties. I guess a mild example of that is the cost of a smart bomb vs a dumb one. A more extreme example is that Israel only barely has the capacity to fly directly to Iran, degrade its nuclear program with pinpoint strikes, and then return home, while it would be a lot cheaper to use ballistic missiles. Caveat: I'm just guessing - I generally don't know what I'm talking about when it comes to the military.
no subject
Date: 2014-04-28 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-28 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-29 11:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-28 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-28 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-28 03:55 pm (UTC)Here's a little about him and his work:
http://www2.education.uiowa.edu/archives/edatiowa/fall08/features/story6.htm
no subject
Date: 2014-04-28 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-28 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-29 02:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-29 12:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-28 02:51 pm (UTC)Serbia and Kosovo
Date: 2014-04-28 03:16 pm (UTC)That said, I agree with you -- Bosnia is the Jan Brady of US peacekeeping interventions.
Doug M.
Re: Serbia and Kosovo
Date: 2014-04-28 03:44 pm (UTC)Rather than saying "The US can't be the world's policeman", I think we should be trying to figure out how to identify more situations like Bosnia and Kosovo.
Re: Serbia and Kosovo
Date: 2014-04-28 11:18 pm (UTC)Re: Serbia and Kosovo
Date: 2014-04-29 12:45 am (UTC)"Stop sending people to kill me. We've already captured five of them, one of them with a bomb and another with a rifle (...) If you don't stop sending killers, I'll send one to Moscow, and I won't have to send a second."
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josip_Broz_Tito
Re: Serbia and Kosovo
Date: 2014-04-29 12:54 am (UTC)Who's the current Chief Executive in Serbia?
no subject
Date: 2014-04-29 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-29 03:14 am (UTC)How's that for meeting the challenges of the current national security environment?