Hugo question
Apr. 14th, 2013 11:19 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Are novellas and novelettes distinct enough that there has to be two categories?
[added later]
If you are here because of "James Nicoll questions whether there should be four written-fiction Hugos. Comments over there, please." note that is inaccurate. In theory we could another written category to make up for the loss of one. Best YA novel, for example.
[added later]
If you are here because of "James Nicoll questions whether there should be four written-fiction Hugos. Comments over there, please." note that is inaccurate. In theory we could another written category to make up for the loss of one. Best YA novel, for example.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-16 03:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-16 04:09 am (UTC)I've heard suggestions for creating a super-novel category for very long novels, although I'm not sure where you'd do the length cut-off. In keeping with the longer-work/shorter-name, I've heard suggested that this new category be named "Best Tome".
no subject
Date: 2013-04-16 09:39 am (UTC)I do remember talking to several Scientologists who were surprised the Battlefield Earth wasn't happily received by the rest of the SF Community as the Best Thing Ever. *sigh*
At this point, if the writers are happy with the current set up, I see no reason to change it. Even if Short Story gets so divided that only 3 meet the 5% rule. And frankly, if we do find that there were a LOT Of nominees, just spread very thin, I don't think expanding the category will help it, in fact it would make things WORSE, giving everyone MORE places to split the vote.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-16 04:25 am (UTC)I'd happily talk about ideas for a "Best Tome" Hugo, too, but I haven't encountered a formal proposal.