Date: 2017-08-10 05:03 pm (UTC)
al_zorra: (Default)
From: [personal profile] al_zorra
Dragon con's reasoning has been, at best, well, you know, stupid.

That writers like Littlewood and Scalzi wished to / finally were 'allowed' to withdraw their works makes perfect sense, and is wise on their parts. They know what is up with all this and why should they be forced to deal / cope / tolerate it?

Date: 2017-08-10 09:16 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] martianmooncrab
Learning curve....

Date: 2017-08-11 04:56 am (UTC)
princessofgeeks: (Damn Fangirls by Lotr Junkie)
From: [personal profile] princessofgeeks
I see what you did there.

Date: 2017-08-11 03:30 pm (UTC)
thewayne: (Default)
From: [personal profile] thewayne
It doesn't make sense that they wouldn't notify nominees in advance of the ballot announcement and give them a chance to withdraw for whatever reason they wish. Scalzi took last year off because he was, to use the Cheetoh Benito's catch phrase, 'tired of winning' and very busy. It only makes sense to extend such a courtesy.

Myself, the list is such a long mishmash of nominees that I'd be very curious to know how many people who are voting have read every single book on it. I read every single Hugo nominee, though I abandoned one after reading several chapters.

That's not how I select new authors to read, but I don't lay claim to logical processes.


james_davis_nicoll: (Default)

October 2017

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 23rd, 2017 04:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios